El ojo de Magritte


The eye of a woman in tears under a bridge.

A door to another reality, a reality that we could see depending on what we know about that reality, when it is linked to a disturbing event.

Each individual has first a woman to say thank you!

The human reaction is to avoid. We avoid perceiving the chaos around the inequality that surrounds us because we are influenced not to see it, or even educated not to look.

If people are hurt or looking for help, the specific human reaction, taught in the majority of societies, would be an emphatic reaction, but as we can freely observe on social networks today, an image of poverty or suffering people can create disgust and a lack of engagement. People suffer in mass of aporophobia, the fear of poverty, that is, the fear of war victims, the fear of victims of natural disasters, which somehow makes no sense in an evolved world, but it is a majority group reaction, which can manifest itself in hysteria and deadly adversity.

The way we perceive reality influences the way we react. Believing that we are somehow better than another human being can have a potentially dangerous result, since exclusion in the group dynamics can become deadly.


But what leads people to ignore basic education for equality so that the human society reaches a level of reality misinterpretation in such a shocking and medieval way that if they have to choose between a very competent woman and a very incompetent man, they prefer to choose the incompetence?


What makes a group reach such a 0 level, that it practically does not respect the credibility of women, knowing that each individual has first a woman to say thank you! for our creation and in the majority of cases also for guiding us, teaching us and protecting us?


Why do large groups choose not to protect women even if by birth it is a personal responsibility? If we want to be taken seriously, we are supposed to change sex and become men? If we do that how would it work for the rest of the world? What exactly are the premises of equality if not equal rights and equal opportunities?

Have you ever heard someone say that women are inferior?
That´s a false belief.

Have you ever heard another woman say that women are inferior?
Now that´s an unfortunate woman who´s been brainwashed so intensely that ends up auto-boycotting her own rights already established by international agreements.


So why are women subject to misogynistic reactions and their rights endangered instead of protected, when in fact human society is based on the idea of the family that would disappear without women?


Anyone who has been misled into thinking that there are reasons to embrace inequality is a disgrace to their feminine creator and a victim of imbecility to me.


If anything, even in the botanical, textile and culinary routine, a woman's brain functions like a programmer's and her super adaptability and skills in group coordination, administration, management and super interpersonal skills make women the obvious first choice for leadership positions. Why not have charming leaders and solved problems instead of displaying insufferable misogynists that multiply problems?


When the equation is so strange that we have to choose, opting for equal opportunity is always better than not supporting the very entities that created us.

Leave a comment